Showing Results for
- 2From:Nature (Vol. 466, Issue 7308) Peer-ReviewedWilliam Nierenberg's relatives disagree with our description of his role in the acid-rain debate in the early 1980s (Nature 466, 435; 2010). But their supporting evidence is a quote from The New York Times that is based...
- 3From:Climatic Change (Vol. 119, Issue 3-4) Peer-ReviewedAbstract Only
- 5From:Climatic Change (Vol. 104, Issue 2) Peer-ReviewedAbstract Only
- 7From:Geotimes (Vol. 46, Issue 3)Citation Only
- 9From:Perspectives on Science (Vol. 16, Issue 3) Peer-ReviewedCitation Only
- 11From:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Vol. 84) Peer-ReviewedAbstract Only
- 12From:Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Vol. 196, Issue 3) Peer-ReviewedAbstract Only
- 13From:Isis (Vol. 82, Issue 314) Peer-ReviewedCitation Only
- 14From:Global Environmental Change (Vol. 36) Peer-ReviewedAbstract Only
- 15From:Nature (Vol. 557, Issue 7706) Peer-ReviewedLike tobacco lobbyists and climate-change deniers, the US Environmental Protection Agency is co-opting scientific trappings to sow doubt, warns Naomi Oreskes. Like tobacco lobbyists and climate-change deniers, the US...
- 19From:BJHS The British Journal for the History of Science (Vol. 23, Issue 76) Peer-ReviewedCitation Only
- 20From:The Chronicle of Higher Education (Vol. 59, Issue 11)Byline: Erik M. Conway and Naomi Oreskes Jonathan Twingley for The Chronicle Review A prediction: When all the votes have been counted and the reams of polling data have been crunched, analyzed, and spun, this...
Choose how you want to be alerted when new results for your search become available.
Subscribe to Gale's RSS feed to get content delivered to your favorite RSS aggregator. Copy and paste the URL below into your reader:
Tell us where to send the alert and how often you want to receive it