Search Results

• • 137 

    Academic Journals

  • Sort by: sorttype.publication.date.desc Newest sorttype.publication.date.asc Oldest sorttype.relevance Relevance

• Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

  Authors:Jonathan A. Sterne, Alex J. Sutton, John P.A. Ioannidis, Norma Terrin, David R. Jones, Joseph Lau, et al.From:British Medical Journal (Vol. 343, Issue 7818) Peer-Reviewed

  Aug. 6, 201157 words Report

   Citation Only

• Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?

  Authors:David Moher and Alexander TsertsvadzeFrom:The Lancet (Vol. 367, Issue 9514) Peer-Reviewed

  Mar. 18, 2006 Article

   Citation Only

• The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials

  Authors:David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, and Douglas AltmanFrom:JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association (Vol. 285, Issue 15) Peer-Reviewed

  Apr. 18, 200138 words Article

   Abstract Only

• Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?

  Authors:Laura McAuley, Ba' Pham, Peter Tugwell, and David MoherFrom:The Lancet (Vol. 356, Issue 9237) Peer-Reviewed

  Oct. 7, 2000357 words Article

   Abstract Only

• Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations.

  Authors:Dianna Wolfe, Salmaan Kanji, Fatemeh Yazdi, Pauline Barbeau, Danielle Rice, Andrew Beck, et al.From:PLoS ONE (Vol. 15, Issue 4) Peer-Reviewed

  Apr. 17, 202022,379 words Article 1480LObjective A current assessment of case reports of possible drug-induced pancreatitis is needed. We systematically reviewed the case report literature to identify drugs with potential associations with acute...

• Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study

  Authors:Chantelle Garritty, Mona Hersi, Candyce Hamel, Adrienne Stevens, Zarah Monfaredi, Claire Butler, et al.From:PLoS ONE (Vol. 15, Issue 8) Peer-Reviewed

  Aug. 26, 20207,169 words Report 1390LBackground As production of rapid reviews (RRs) increases in healthcare, knowing how to efficiently convey RR evidence to various end-users is important given they are often intended to directly inform...

• Propofol vs Midazolam for ICU Sedation(*)

  Authors:Richard I. Hall, Dean Sandham, Pierre Cardinal, Martin Tweeddale, David Moher, Xiaohua Wang, et al.From:Chest (Vol. 119, Issue 4) Peer-Reviewed

  Apr. 20014,921 words Article A Canadian Multicenter Randomized Trial Study objectives: To determine whether sedation with propofol would lead to shorter times to tracheal extubation and ICU length of stay than sedation with midazolam. Design:...

• Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties.

  Authors:Danielle B. Rice, Hana Raffoul, John P.A. Ioannidis, and David MoherFrom:British Medical Journal (Vol. 369, Issue 8251) Peer-Reviewed

  June 27, 202048 words Report

   Citation Only

• Complementary and alternative medicine use by pediatric specialty outpatients

  Authors:Denise Adams, Simon Dagenais, Tammy Clifford, Lola Baydala, W. James King, Marilou Hervas-Malo, et al.From:Pediatrics (Vol. 131, Issue 2) Peer-Reviewed

  Feb. 2013 Report

   Citation Only

• Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement

  Authors:Merrick Zwarenstein, Shaun Treweek, Sean Tunis, Douglas G. Altman, Joel J. Gagnier, Brian Haynes, et al.From:British Medical Journal (Vol. 337, Issue 7680) Peer-Reviewed

  Nov. 22, 200835 words Article

   Citation Only

• Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement

  Authors:Joel J. Gagnier, Heather Boon, Paula Rochon, David Moher, Joanne Barnes, and Claire BombardierFrom:Annals of Internal Medicine (Vol. 144, Issue 5) Peer-Reviewed

  Mar. 7, 2006114 words Author abstract

   Abstract Only

• The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials

  Authors:David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, and Douglas G. AltmanFrom:Annals of Internal Medicine (Vol. 134, Issue 8) Peer-Reviewed

  Apr. 17, 2001244 words Article

   Abstract Only

• How to assess new treatments

  Authors:Robert Slinger and David MoherFrom:The Western Journal of Medicine (Vol. 174, Issue 3) Peer-Reviewed

  Mar. 20013,563 words Article Summary points * Unbiased assessment of the effects of therapy requires comparison of groups with similar baseline risk of adverse outcome * Groups selected from different places and times, systematically by...

• How did the authors synthesize the data and make their conclusions?

  Authors:David Moher, Alejandro R. Jadad, and Terry P. KlassenFrom:Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine (Vol. 152, Issue 9) Peer-Reviewed

  Sept. 199877 words Article

   Abstract Only

• Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement

  Authors:Colin Begg, Mildred Cho, Susan Eastwood, Richard Horton, David Moher, Ingram Olkin, et al.From:JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association (Vol. 276, Issue 8) Peer-Reviewed

  Aug. 28, 199685 words Article

   Abstract Only

• Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics

  Authors:Rafaela Bassani, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Matthew J. Page, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher, and Rafael Sarkis-OnofreFrom:Journal of Dentistry (Vol. 82) Peer-Reviewed

  Mar. 2019432 words Report

   Abstract Only

• Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.

  Authors:Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher, Kelly D. Cobey, Gregory L. Bryson, Samantha Cukier, Kristiann Allen, et al.From:Nature (Vol. 576, Issue 7786) Peer-Reviewed

  Dec. 12, 20192,217 words Article 1350LLeading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. Leading scholars and...

• Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews

  Authors:Wanlop Jaidee, David Moher, and Malinee LaopaiboonFrom:PLoS ONE (Vol. 5, Issue 7) Peer-Reviewed

  July 13, 20105,085 words Medical condition ov... 1380LBackground The recommended interval between updates for systematic reviews included in The Cochrane Library is 2 years. However, it is unclear whether this interval is always appropriate. Whereas excessive updating...

• Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers Caring for Patients with Filovirus Disease: A Rapid Review

  Authors:Mona Hersi, Adrienne Stevens, Pauline Quach, Candyce Hamel, Kednapa Thavorn, Chantelle Garritty, et al.From:PLoS ONE (Vol. 10, Issue 10) Peer-Reviewed

  Oct. 9, 20157,035 words Report 1400LBackground A rapid review, guided by a protocol, was conducted to inform development of the World Health Organization's guideline on personal protective equipment in the context of the ongoing (2013-present) Western...

• When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist.

  Authors:Peter Tugwell, Vivian Andrea Welch, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara J. Maxwell, Elie A. Akl, Marc T. Avey, et al.From:British Medical Journal (Vol. 371, Issue 8264) Peer-Reviewed

  Oct. 17, 202049 words Report

   Citation Only