Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations

Citation metadata

From: Nature Reviews Drug Discovery(Vol. 18, Issue 10)
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Document Type: Report
Length: 10,361 words
Lexile Measure: 1580L

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

Researchers, clinicians, policymakers and patients are increasingly interested in questions about therapeutic interventions that are difficult or costly to answer with traditional, free-standing, parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Examples include scenarios in which there is a desire to compare multiple interventions, to generate separate effect estimates across subgroups of patients with distinct but related conditions or clinical features, or to minimize downtime between trials. In response, researchers have proposed new RCT designs such as adaptive platform trials (APTs), which are able to study multiple interventions in a disease or condition in a perpetual manner, with interventions entering and leaving the platform on the basis of a predefined decision algorithm. APTs offer innovations that could reshape clinical trials, and several APTs are now funded in various disease areas. With the aim of facilitating the use of APTs, here we review common features and issues that arise with such trials, and offer recommendations to promote best practices in their design, conduct, oversight and reporting. Adaptive platform trials, which can study multiple therapeutic interventions in a disease in a perpetual manner, offer the potential to improve the efficiency of drug development. This article reviews common features and issues that arise with such trials, and puts forward recommendations to promote best practices in their design, conduct, oversight and reporting.

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A601353038