Showing Results for
- Academic Journals (9)
Search Results
- 9
Academic Journals
- 9
-
From:Notre Dame Law Review (Vol. 96, Issue 5)This Essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics. As the current Court has turned against...
-
From:University of Pennsylvania Law Review (Vol. 161, Issue 2)INTRODUCTION In the past few years, four courts of appeals have applied a presumption against recognition of a Bivens cause of action (1) in dismissing damages suits alleging constitutional violations arising out of...
-
From:Washington University Law Review (Vol. 90, Issue 5)ABSTRACT In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics suit against employees of a privately run federal...
-
From:University of Pennsylvania Law Review (Vol. 161, Issue 2)III. BIVENS AND ITS AFTERMATH Although the judges of the en banc Second Circuit disagreed vehemently over the correct outcome in Arar v. Ashcroft, they (and their colleagues on the Fourth, Seventh, and D.C. Circuits)...
-
From:Harvard Law Review (Vol. 125, Issue 4)FEDERAL STATUTES--WESTFALL ACT--D.C. CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT U.S. OFFICIALS ARE IMMUNE FROM ALIEN TORT STATUTE CLAIMS.--Ali v. Rumsfeld, 649 F.3d 762 (D.C. Cir. 2011). Despite the numerous detainee cases working their way...
-
From:Notre Dame Law Review (Vol. 96, Issue 5)As the Supreme Court weakens the Bivens constitutional tort cause of action and federal officers avoid liability for unlawful behavior through qualified immunity, we should recollect the merit of the common-law tort...
-
From:Notre Dame Law Review (Vol. 96, Issue 5)INTRODUCTION In its most recent decision narrowly construing Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, (1) the Supreme Court derided Bivens as the product of an "' ancien regime,'... [in which]...
-
From:Public Administration Review (Vol. 56, Issue 4) Peer-ReviewedWhat have been the implications of the 1988 Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act? The Westfall Act was passed in 1988 to re-immunize federal workers from suits in common law tort, such as...
-
From:Notre Dame Law Review (Vol. 96, Issue 5)INTRODUCTION The propriety of Bivens (1) actions is part of the debate about federal common law. (2) For some judges and scholars, implied actions are a particularly reprobated form of federal common law. (3) Justice...