Showing Results for
- All Content Types
- Academic Journals (831)
Search Results
- 831
Academic Journals
- 831
- 1From:Michigan Law Review (Vol. 121, Issue 4) Peer-ReviewedSeveral situations cause a case to be moot. These include settlement agreements, party collusion, changes in litigant status, and extrinsic circumstances thwarting the court from granting any relief. The final reason is...
- 2From:Societies (Vol. 13, Issue 2) Peer-ReviewedIn current times, the concept of democracy has been transformed due to the ups and downs of the hyperdigitalized society, modifying its discourses and forms of participation. Recognizing that video games maintain a...
- 3From:Harvard Law Review (Vol. 136, Issue 3)Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (1) (NLRA) requires that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) petition a court of appeals if it seeks enforcement of its orders, (2) which include "consent...
- 4From:Review of Constitutional Studies (Vol. 26, Issue 2)Canadian federalism and rights are frequently portrayed as being in tension with one another. The entrenchment of rights in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is often understood as affirming pan-Canadian uniform values...
- 5From:Notre Dame Law Review (Vol. 98, Issue 1)The President's power to remove and control subordinate executive officers has sparked a constitutional debate that began in 1789 and rages on today. Leading originalists claim that the Constitution created a "unitary...
- 6From:Washington University Law Review (Vol. 100, Issue 2)ABSTRACT In 2020, the Supreme Court rendered a landmark decision in Trump v. Mazars establishing four factors for determining the validity of congressional subpoenas for a sitting president's personal papers. In an...
- 7From:Insight Turkey (Vol. 24, Issue 4) Peer-ReviewedThis study attempts to present and analyze the chaotic nature of the Iraqi constitutional system since 2005 and its impact on the political-economic and social crises. The study also seeks to explore sectarian problems...
- 8From:Gateway Journalism Review (Vol. 53, Issue 367)The Framers of the Constitution said they left out the Bill of Rights because they thought their architecture of government protected people's rights through checks and balances, the separations of powers and federalism...
- 9From:Administrative Law Review (Vol. 74, Issue 4) Peer-ReviewedWhen the Supreme Court's member's find that the most plausible reading of a law would make it unconstitutional, what should the Court do? From our vantage, that is the most interesting and important question that emerges...
- 10From:Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics (Vol. 35, Issue 4) Peer-Reviewed
Legitimizing the 'Illegitimate': How the Supreme Court Can Restore its Legitimacy in the Public Eye.
INTRODUCTION Over the course of the 2020 presidential campaign, particularly after the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, the term "court-packing" became a household phrase and a talking point amongst Republicans... - 11From:Georgetown Immigration Law Journal (Vol. 37, Issue 1) Peer-ReviewedExpedited removal proceedings are truncated immigration decisions presided over by executive agents who are also imbued with the power to decide when such proceedings can be utilized. One of the statutes that permits...
- 12From:Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics (Vol. 35, Issue 4) Peer-ReviewedINTRODUCTION They had a laudable goal: a nation designed so strategically that too much centralized power could never come to be. On parchment paper, the federal structure the Framers proceeded to build seemed like the...
- 13From:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Política (Vol. 17, Issue 3) Peer-ReviewedSubject contextualization: In Brazilian Constitutional Law, the contours of impeachment were conferred, since the beginning of the republican period, in intense debate with the American doctrine. However, a noteworthy...
- 14From:Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional (Vol. 8, Issue 2) Peer-ReviewedThe Brazilian's Supreme Court has ruled that legal norms which determine the prior approval of public contracts by the Legislative Power are unconstitutional based on the principle of separation of powers, based on the...
- 15From:American Journal of International Law (Vol. 116, Issue 3) Peer-ReviewedFor all the attention paid to the panelists and Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Secretariat plays an overlooked and increasingly important role in the dispute settlement mechanism (DSM),...
- 16From:Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional (Vol. 8, Issue 2) Peer-ReviewedThe Federal Constitution of 1988 has already undergone 125 reforms, so that it is possible to raise questions about the repercussions of the intense use of the Amendments to the assurance of Constitutional Supremacy. In...
- 17From:Public Contract Law Journal (Vol. 51, Issue 4)The United States government procurement system should exemplify transparency, integrity, and competition. Since its inception, it has stood for equity amongst all contractors and a mutually benefiting relationship...
- 18From:Administrative Law Review (Vol. 74, Issue 3) Peer-ReviewedThis Article examines the relationship between appointment and presidential removal of "Officers of the United States," which scholars and the Supreme Court generally treat as separate matters. The analysis of the...
- 19From:Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (Vol. 29, Issue 2) Peer-ReviewedThis article discusses the challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic poses to the current concepts of globalization, universality of human rights, and the rules-based international order. This article discusses how Russia...
- 20From:Albany Law Review (Vol. 85, Issue 2)I. EXECUTIVE UNILATERAL ORDERS AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS The Trump Administration asserted the obscure legal doctrines of inter-circuit non-acquiescence and intra-circuit non-acquiescence to refuse to follow the...