Vocational Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury; Prevalence and Risk Factors After 1 Year in a Multivariable Model.

Citation metadata

Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, WK Health
Document Type: Clinical report; Brief article
Length: 304 words

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

Byline: Rajiv Singh, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom (Drs Singh, Humphries, Mason, and Lecky); Osborn Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (Drs Singh and Humphries), and Occupational Health Department, Northern General Hospital (Dr Basu), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom; and Institute of Work Psychology, Sheffield University Management School, Sheffield, United Kingdom (Dr Dawson).; Jeremy Dawson; Subhashis Basu; Thomas J. Humphries; Suzanne Mason; Fiona Lecky Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of employment status (ES) or full-time study after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a representative population and its predictive factors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Regional Major Trauma Centre. Participants: In total, 1734 consecutive individuals of working age, admitted with TBI to a Regional Trauma Centre, were recruited and followed up at 8 weeks and 1 year with face-to-face interview. Median age was 37.2 years (17.5-58.2); 51% had mild TBI, and 36.8% had a normal computed tomographic (CT) scan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Complete or partial/modified return to employment or study as an ordinal variable. RESULTS: At 1 year, only 44.9% returned to full-time work/study status, 28.7% had a partial or modified return, and 26.4% had no return at all. In comparison with status at 6 weeks, 9.9% had lower or reduced work status. Lower ES was associated with greater injury severity, more CT scan abnormality, older age, mechanism of assault, and presence of depression, alcohol intoxication, or a psychiatric history. The multivariable model was highly significant (P CONCLUSIONS: Employment at 1 year is poor and changes in work status are frequent, occurring in both directions. While associations with certain features may allow targeting of vulnerable individuals in future, the majority of model variance remains unexplained and requires further investigation.

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A696079357