Richard Dawkins replies to David Sloan Wilson

Citation metadata

Date: Winter 2008
From: Skeptic (Altadena, CA)(Vol. 13, Issue 4)
Publisher: Skeptics Society & Skeptic Magazine
Document Type: Article
Length: 460 words
Lexile Measure: 1290L

Document controls

Main content

Article Preview :

IN HIS SKEPTIC ARTICLE ENTITLED "WHY Richard Dawkins is Wrong About Religion" (initially published online in eSkeptic and, David Sloan Wilson writes: "When Dawkins' The God Delusion was published I naturally assumed that he was basing his critique of religion on the scientific study of religion from an evolutionary perspective. I regret to report otherwise."

Why would Wilson 'naturally assume' aw such thing? Reasonable, perhaps, to assume that I would pay some attention to the evolution of religion, but why base a critique on an evolutionary perspective, any more than on Assyrian woodwind instruments or the burrowing behaviour of aardvarks? The God Delusion does, as it happens, have a chapter on the evolutionary origins...

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A174058990