Dialogue between Fukuyama's account of the end of history and Derrida's hauntology

Citation metadata

Author: Chris Hughes
Date: Fall 2012
Publisher: The Society for Philosophy and Literary Studies
Document Type: Article
Length: 8,616 words
Lexile Measure: 1550L

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

This paper explores the relationship between Fukuyama's account of history and Derrida's theory of hauntology. Initially, I use Derrida's idea of hauntology to critique Fukuyama's account of an end of history. I argue that Derrida's idea of a hauntology is a valuable theoretical tool for theorising about politics, since Derrida shows that the death of a particular social/political system (e.g. Communism) does not entail the death/devaluing of the thinker(s) who inspired that system, since critics of the contemporary social and political order may have something valuable to offer contemporary political thought. However, I do not endorse the view that history cannot reach an end point just because there are specters waiting to return. Instead, I argue that it is possible to bridge the apparent dualistic binary between Derrida's hauntology and Fukuyama's end of history, since the specter is something which must be recognised and realised at the end of history.

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A312402935