Overlapping Institutions, Learning, and Dispute Initiation in Regional Trade Agreements: Evidence from South America

Citation metadata

Date: June 2014
From: International Studies Quarterly(Vol. 58, Issue 2)
Publisher: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.
Document Type: Report
Length: 220 words

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

Byline: Laura Gomez-Mera, Andrea Molinari This article studies the functioning of dispute settlement mechanisms in regional trade agreements (RTAs) and their interaction with multilateral trade institutions. We examine the determinants of formal dispute initiation in RTAs among South American countries. Using an original data set of RTA disputes, we investigate the impact of economic power disparities, domestic political factors, and previous experience on the decision of South American countries to initiate a dispute against a regional trade partner. Our analysis indicates that both power asymmetries and domestic political factors influence the likelihood of dispute initiation at the regional level. We also find strong support for our hypothesis that previous experience in dispute settlement increases the probability that a country will file a complaint against a regional trade partner using regional mechanisms. Perhaps more interestingly, our empirical analysis also uncovers important cross-institutional effects. Prior participation in WTO disputes increases the propensity of states to file complaints at the regional level. Article Note: Laura Gomez-Mera is an Assistant Professor of International Studies at the University of Miami. She currently a Visiting Fellow at the Kellogg Institute for International Studies, Notre Dame University. Andrea Molinari is a Research Fellow at the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) and is currently working as a Senior Adviser at the African Development Bank. CAPTION(S):

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A397546568