Satellite soil moisture data assimilation impacts on modeling weather variables and ozone in the southeastern US - Part 1: An overview.

Citation metadata

From: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics(Vol. 21, Issue 14)
Publisher: Copernicus GmbH
Document Type: Article
Length: 521 words

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

This study evaluates the impact of satellite soil moisture (SM) data assimilation (DA) on regional weather and ozone (O.sub.3) modeling over the southeastern US during the summer. Satellite SM data are assimilated into the Noah land surface model using an ensemble Kalman filter approach within National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Land Information System framework, which is semicoupled with the Weather Research and Forecasting model with online Chemistry (WRF-Chem; standard version The DA impacts on the model performance of SM, weather states, and energy fluxes show strong spatiotemporal variability. Dense vegetation and water use from human activities unaccounted for in the modeling system are among the factors impacting the effectiveness of the DA. The daytime surface O.sub.3 responses to the DA can largely be explained by the temperature-driven changes in biogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds and soil nitric oxide, chemical reaction rates, and dry deposition velocities. On a near-biweekly timescale, the DA modified the mean daytime and daily maximum 8 h average surface O.sub.3 by up to 2-3 ppbv, with the maximum impacts occurring in areas where daytime surface air temperature most strongly (i.e., by â¼2 K) responded to the DA. The DA impacted WRF-Chem upper tropospheric O.sub.3 (e.g., for its daytime-mean, by up to 1-1.5 ppbv) partially via altering the transport of O.sub.3 and its precursors from other places as well as in situ chemical production of O.sub.3 from lightning and other emissions. Case studies during airborne field campaigns suggest that the DA improved the model treatment of convective transport and/or lightning production. In the cases that the DA improved the modeled SM, weather fields, and some O.sub.3 -related processes, its influences on the model's O.sub.3 performance at various altitudes are not always as desirable. This is in part due to the uncertainty in the model's key chemical inputs, such as anthropogenic emissions, and the model representation of stratosphere-troposphere exchanges. This can also be attributable to shortcomings in model parameterizations (e.g., chemical mechanism, natural emission, photolysis and deposition schemes), including those related to representing water availability impacts. This study also shows that the WRF-Chem upper tropospheric O.sub.3 response to the DA has comparable magnitudes with its response to the estimated US anthropogenic emission changes within 2 years. As reductions in anthropogenic emissions in North America would benefit the mitigation of O.sub.3 pollution in its downwind regions, this analysis highlights the important role of SM in quantifying air pollutants' source-receptor relationships between the US and its downwind areas. It also emphasizes that using up-to-date anthropogenic emissions is necessary for accurately assessing the DA impacts on the model performance of O.sub.3 and other pollutants over a broad region. This work will be followed by a Noah-Multiparameterization (with dynamic vegetation)-based study over the southeastern US, in which selected processes including photosynthesis and O.sub.3 dry deposition will be the foci.

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A669226882