Reconceptualising 'impact' through anthropology's ethnographic practices

Citation metadata

Date: Summer 2015
From: Anthropology in Action(Vol. 22, Issue 2)
Publisher: Berghahn Books, Inc.
Document Type: Report
Length: 6,344 words
Lexile Measure: 1490L

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

Academic funding bodies are increasingly measuring research impact using accountability and reward assessments. Scholars have argued that frameworks attempting to measure the use-value of knowledge production could end up influencing the selection of research topics, limiting research agendas, and privileging linear over complex research designs. Our article responds to these concerns by calling upon insights from anthropology to reconceptualise impact. We argue that, to conduct socially beneficial studies, impact needs to be turned from a product to an inclusive process of engagement. Anthropology's epistemologically and methodologically rich tradition of ethnography offers a particularly apposite set of tools to achieve this goal. We present three concrete examples of how we have used ethnography to impact on the work we carry out, particularly in shaping multidisciplinary team-based research approaches. Keywords: anthropology, ethnography, healthcare, impact, participatory research, process, reflexivity, REF2014

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A428182843