Clearing the air: pursuing a course to define the federal government's role in the voluntary carbon offset market

Citation metadata

Author: Thomas P. Healy
Date: Fall 2009
From: Administrative Law Review(Vol. 61, Issue 4)
Publisher: American Bar Association
Document Type: Article
Length: 9,660 words

Document controls

Main content

Article Preview :
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction I. The Carbon Market A. Carbon Offsets B. Selling and Producing Offsets C. Challenges to the Carbon Market's Credibility II. Regulatory Initiatives that Could Be Applied to the Offset Market A. The Green Guides B. Energy Information Administration C. EPA Climate Leaders Program D. Private Regulatory Initiatives Underway in the Carbon Market III. Regulation Will Strengthen the Voluntary Carbon Offset Market A. Overall Benefits of Regulation B. Responses to Critics of Regulation of the Offset Market IV. Regulatory Solutions for the Carbon Offset Market A. DOE and Climate Leaders Programs as a Basis for Regulation of the Carbon Offset Market B. Regulating the Carbon Offset Market with the Green Guides C. Hybrid Public--Private Regulatory Scheme D. Benefits and Drawbacks of Regulatory Solutions V. The Importance of the Voluntary Carbon Offset Market to Reducing GHG Emissions Conclusion


The carbon offset market grew out of the binding carbon-reduction commitments made by the Kyoto Protocol signatory nations. (1) The treaty requires signatories to establish emissions objectives for the five-year period starting in 2008 and ending in 2012. (2) The thirty-seven industrialized nations that are signatories to the treaty are required to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) by an average of 5% below 1990 levels starting in 2008. (3) The Kyoto Protocol provides signatory nations flexibility in meeting GHG reduction targets. The carbon offset market is one of the tools that the signatory nations developed in order to meet those treaty obligations. (4) The carbon offset market works by matching a reduction in GHG emissions in one location with continuing emissions elsewhere. (5)

The carbon market in the United States is almost entirely unregulated, in contrast to the European carbon market, which is highly regulated as part of a mandatory GHG reduction program designed to achieve compliance with the Kyoto Protocol. (6) The United States has neither ratified the Kyoto Protocol nor made a binding commitment to reduce GHG emissions, so the use of carbon offsets in the United States is voluntary. (7) As a result, consumers and businesses in the United States generally buy carbon offsets to prepare for future regulation, receive good publicity, and help the environment. One survey indicated that companies that are not seen as environmentally friendly will lose their market share, giving companies a strong incentive to purchase carbon offsets so they can claim carbon neutrality. (8) Companies also participate in the voluntary market in preparation for a future mandatory GHG emissions-reduction program, hoping that the offsets purchased today will be usable under a future emissions cap. (9) Additionally, many companies are working to reduce or offset their emissions on a voluntary basis because they hope that their actions will help mold future regulation. (10) The total value of the U.S. voluntary carbon market in 2008 was estimated to be $705 million with 123.4 million tons of carbon dioxide (C[O.sub.2]) equivalent sold. (11) It is estimated that the size of the market will continue to increase in the coming years. (12)

This Comment will examine...

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A216034629