Short-term group schema cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adults with personality disorders and personality disorder features: Associations with changes in symptomatic distress, schemas, schema modes and coping styles

Citation metadata

From: Behaviour Research and Therapy(Vol. 51, Issue 8)
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Document Type: Disease/Disorder overview
Length: 281 words

Document controls

Main content

Abstract :

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: Byline: Fritz Renner, Michiel van Goor, Marcus Huibers, Arnoud Arntz, Betty Butz, David Bernstein Abstract: The aim of this pilot study was to document the effects of a group schema cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention (SCBT-g; van Vreeswijk & Broersen, 2006) on global symptomatic distress in young adults with personality disorders or personality disorder features. We also sought to determine the stability of maladaptive schemas, schema modes, and coping responses throughout treatment as well as relations among these variables with improvement in symptomatic distress during treatment. Twenty-six young adults (mean age 22.5 years; range: 18-29 years) with a primary diagnosis of a DSM-IV Cluster-B or Cluster-C personality disorder or with personality disorder features participated in the 20-session SCBT-g protocol. Global symptomatic distress decreased substantially from pre-treatment to post-treatment (d = 0.81). Maladaptive schemas, schema modes and dysfunctional coping responses decreased with medium to large effect sizes (d's = 0.56 and 0.98, respectively), however decrease in maladaptive schemas was not significant after controlling for symptomatic distress. Adaptive schema modes increased slightly (d = 0.40) throughout treatment. Baseline levels of maladaptive schemas predicted symptomatic distress concurrently and at mid-treatment but not at post-treatment. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that SCBT-g might be an effective treatment for young adults with personality disorders or personality disorder features in terms of improvements in global symptomatic distress and underlying vulnerability. Author Affiliation: (a) Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands (b) PSY-Q Roermond, The Netherlands (c) Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands Article History: Received 3 December 2012; Revised 2 May 2013; Accepted 23 May 2013

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A341347009